Originally posted on sciy.org by Debashish Banerji on Fri 08 Aug 2008 07:36 PM PDT
SRI AUROBINDO AND THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY
But these limitations notwithstanding, we must concede that
never before in the history of mankind has such a concentrated universal focus
of study been brought to bear on humanity and the world s/he inhabits. Additionally, never before has such a
systematic power of material unification been brought to bear on humanity. The
power of abstraction of objective fact and subjective experience into
information and the universal dissemination of information, its universal and
ubiquitous translatability, both in terms of languages and of mobility through
space and time, has inundated the psycho-sphere of earth, making it possible
for large populations worldwide to be swept by personalities and ideologies or
to access these at will. Though originating in mental processes and based on a
definition and fixation of the human as a rational being, this concentrated need
to know and master man and nature has resulted in (or maybe, from another
vantage, is the result of) an intensity of consciousness, which has manifested
in a section of humanity as a stress of re-evaluation and redefinition. From
the middle of the 19th c., one encounters the beginnings of a
worldwide ferment towards such a redefinition of human culture and identity. Whether
in the arts, music, literature, philosophy, psychology or science, the forms of
human understanding and creative expression have undergone unprecedented
revolutionary changes which seem to have rendered the past largely obsolete.
If one looks at these efforts today, what strikes us is
their common drive towards a subjective revolution critiquing the dominant
paradigm of the Enlightenment and attempting to overcome its trenchant divides.
The materialistic bias of the modern age had remained so far unquestioned; it
was considered the new datum of civilization, the privileged vantage of reason
upon its objectified world. What was challenged in all these new breakthroughs
was the location of consciousness in this modern state of being. Was matter
after all as unconscious, as conditioned, measurable and predictable as it
seemed? Could forms of life and mind be reduced to the same objectivity as matter?
Was consciousness the prerogative of the human mind or was the mind as
conditioned in its own way as the world it presumed to understand? Was
consciousness limited to the human mind or were there forms of consciousness
outside of mind? Could human beings have access to any such forms of
consciousness? Were mind as subject and the world as its object distinct and
separate, could mind be reduced to matter or matter be reduced to mind or did
they interfere with each other in their mutuality? Could the human being
discover and identify with a consciousness which transcended the duality of
subject and object, mind and matter? These and other such questions occupied
the thinking and expression of many creative personalities from the middle of
the 19th c. The naturalism of post-Renaissance art was challenged in
a succession of artistic ideologies based in experimental subjectivism. Quantum
Physics shook the bastion of material determinism with a description of Matter
in which consciousness seemed implicated (and vice versa). Psychology extended
the ranges of consciousness beyond waking rationality into the worlds of symbol
and dream. In all this revision of the cultural universe of modern man,
Philosophy too played its part in rethinking human identity. At the head of the
consciousness revolution of postmodernism stands Friedrich Nietzsche who,
drawing on the protean power of the creative will, announced the self-exceeding
of man in the superman.
Sri Aurobindo was born at a time of such ferment in the city
of
Of course, the scope of such a statement as the Mother’s
opens the doors on the invisible occult action of Sri Aurobindo. To acknowledge
such an action is a matter of faith, and perhaps faith is a critical component
in orienting ourselves towards the future, but a more active aspect of such
orientation needs to be an informed understanding of Sri Aurobindo’s
contribution towards the future through his more visible expressions,
particularly his writings. So what does Sri Aurobindo give us in his writings,
that helps in orienting us towards the future? Sri Aurobindo provides us with a
comprehensive map towards the future – diverse yet integral – every part of
which is pregnant with the fullness of the whole, in keeping with the
perfection of a self-existent and accomplished consciousness presaging the
vision of human fulfillment. In his magnificent epic Savitri, Sri Aurobindo has
a line which describes well the power of his own manifestation and its action
upon the future of humanity. He says: “In the beginning is prepared the close.â€[3]
Indeed, this is also part of his theory of evolution. It casts a penetrating
light on the evolution of consciousness in time, or shall we say of
consciousness as time? A new age is prepared by a descent of the possibilities
of its full manifestation in seed form at its very initiation. This is the
intervention, the descent from above, the avatar whose disclosure of a new
power of being and consciousness is represented by Sri Aurobindo in the first
canto of Savitri: the Symbol Dawn. Sri Aurobindo in his life and works
represents such a dawn of the supramental age and initiates us into its
flowering in our lives. More specifically, in his writings, he gives us a new
philosophy, a new psychology, a new theory of creative expression and a new
theory of social and political life – making up in their totality, a new vision
of human being and becoming, individual and collective, a blueprint for a destiny
which he announces as a life divine.
What is central to Sri Aurobindo’s vision of the future is
the identity of the human being. Effecting a decisive revisioning of the
Enlightenment’s definition of man as a rational being, he sets the agenda for
the future: “Man is a transitional being.â€[4]
Man is not stable, a species definable by his existing faculties or empirically
representable. The human is defined by his orientation towards the future and
his power of self-creation. In saying this, Sri Aurobindo becomes aligned with
the philosophy of existentialism and one can hear in him the echo of
Nietzsche’s call for the self-exceeding of man into the superman. But Sri
Aurobindo’s superman is not grounded in the hubris of human will. Though one
may say that in Nietzsche too, the human will is only an aspect of the
will-to-become intrinsic to reality, no ground of infinite plenitude or
self-existent perfection supports, invites or responds to this will in
Nietzsche’s case. In Sri Aurobindo, the power of human self-exceeding is an
aspiration, individually co-creative with a spiritual power of Becoming, active
everywhere in the universe and transcending it, that is responsible for the
great hours of evolutionary change. This power of becoming carries the
self-existent ranges of conscious Being, the living images of perfection proper
to each rung of consciousness, which may manifest at every stage of earthly
evolution, and which seeks for a fully conscious manifestation here. A double
process of involution and evolution, and correspondingly, of pressure from
above and expression from below, or of aspiration from below and descent from
above propels the universal manifestation of consciousness on earth. At the
level of the human this process becomes individually conscious and seeks an
embodied fulfillment of its origin, the individualized ascent to the
consciousness of the Idea which has become all this manifestation and the
descent of this consciousness bringing its own perfect unity, freedom and
creativity into the laws of the manifestation.
Here, one may say Sri Aurobindo seems to rub shoulders with
Hegel and other philosophers of evolution who see Consciousness involved in
earth and evolving through history. But this resemblance again is partial.
Whereas the Hegelian Idea works out its inexorable syntheses using nature and
humanity deterministically as instruments, with no occult process of the
aspiration of Ignorance from below and the response of a self-existent
Knowledge above or of the resistance of a conscious denial in the Ignorance,
what one may call Falsehood, rendering the emergence of consciousness
precarious, Sri Aurobindo’s philosophy of evolution uncovers the arduous agency
of becoming in the Ignorance and particularly in the human individual.
Moreover, the Hegelian Idea remains rational, a post-Enlightenment notion of
consciousness reaching its full expression and its identity of being in
collective human “understanding†and therein reaching the “end of historyâ€[5];
while for Sri Aurobindo, the Idea involved in the processes of history is what
he terms the “Real-Idea†of Supermind, a faculty and operation of consciousness
from which Mind is derived and whose properties of infinite freedom and
wholeness mind aspires to but can never experientially comprehend, except
through its self-transcendence.
It is in this positing of Supermind as the ontological
foundation of superman, that Sri Aurobindo travels furthest from the western
tradition of philosophy as speculative metaphysics, and brings to its
disciplinary formulations a revisionary power rooted in the history of Indian
thought – the subservience of thinking to intuition and experience, both in the
ground of theorizing and in the goal of validation. Here we realize that even
in his method of philosophizing, Sri Aurobindo sketches out a direction for the
future of humanity – a trans-cultural thinking, which couples our boldest
intuitions and their consequences to a power of realization through a
discipline of experience. As mentioned above, this future-gazing redefinition
of the scope of human identity as a dynamic self-creation, and redefinition of
the role of thinking as wedded to such a notion of identity had already made
its appearance in the western tradition through Nietzsche and following him,
through a number of new fields of philosophy, such as phenomenology, the
philosophy of experience, and ontology, the philosophy of being. But the
fledgeling attempts to create new disciplinary boundaries by these fields and
in a radical way, establish philosophy as an alternate or subjective science,
had long been anticipated in the Indian tradition, where thought formulation of
the being and becoming of man and the universe and their mutual relationship
with a transcendental ground of consciousness (darshana) had always been an
inseparable younger sibling of an applied psychology of experience (yoga),
leading to ontological change.
If Sri Aurobindo’s philosophy can be contextualized within
the history of western philosophy and shown to break new ground both conceptually
and methodologically there, it is equally a native of the tradition of Indian
darshana and makes an equally ground-breaking contribution there, which pertains
principally to the future of humanity. Heretofore, the Indian traditions of
darshana and yoga had established a trenchant division between the Real and the
Phenomenal, basing the first as eternally non-dual and self-conscious (Vidya)
and the second as eternally fragmented and unconscious or at best,
semi-conscious (Avidya). Human beings found themselves born into the
unchangeable cosmic condition of Avidya but had the potential of consciousness
to abandon this field of Ignorance and know themselves individually as one with
or a part or participant of divine self-consciousness, Vidya. Of course, this
pithy formulation hardly does justice to the complicated debates on the reality
or unreality of the Avidya, the subsidiary existence, non-existence or
perpetual separate existence of the human essence (atman), the impersonal
(non-theistic) or personal (theistic) qualitative reality of the Vidya and of
its varied possibilities of relation or lack thereof with the Avidya and the
human individual (jiva), etc., which have made up the rich fabric of discourse and
sectarian practice in the Indian tradition. But what Sri Aurobindo brought to
this tradition is the idea of significance to the temporality of the phenomenal
cosmos, Avidya, which challenged the discursive boundaries of the existing
tradition, even while affirming its foundational experiences and intuitions
arising from the Veda and the Vedanta. Looked at from within this tradition,
Sri Aurobindo’s transcendental and evolutionary theism, provides a coherent vision
of Avidya as an evolving self-representation of Vidya, marked by choice and a
relational identity with the Vidya in its individual constitutents, emerging
through the consolidation of a soul personality through repeated
life-experience (rebirth) and arriving at the possibility of a specific
embodiment of the transcendental Person in each human being. Thus the journey
of the human soul from Avidya to Vidya follows both an individual and a
representative cosmic trajectory, destined towards a transformation of the
Avidya to a play (lila) of the self-conscious unity of the Divine Person with
its infinite individualized self-representations. This is the Life Divine, an
ontological change in the cosmic conditions of earthly existence, which can achieve
itself only through the leverage of a power of consciousness known as
Supermind, where the embodied individual exists in identity with the cosmic
being and the transcendental Person in the field of the play of difference in
Oneness. It must be realized that Sri Aurobindo enunciated this darshana using over
1000 pages of intuitively luminous and closely argued text in his magnum opus,
The Life Divine and thus my attempt to outline his contribution in these few
sentences is necessarily very inadequate. But what can be affirmed is the
felicity and completeness with which all the questions of the Indian tradition
are answered, the loose ends and absences demonstrated and tied and the
conclusions put in place in a structure of overwhelming coherence and integrality.
What emerges from this also is the sense of the contemporary
location of human consciousness at the edge of a species-wide becoming, being
urged beyond mind towards the conscious choice of a collaboration with the
evolutionary imperative leading to a supramental future. The elements and
dynamics of such a collaboration in terms of its practices and experiences, are
what Sri Aurobindo develops in his works on yoga such as The Synthesis of Yoga,
The Mother and The Letters on Yoga. Modern psychology is today struggling to
emerge from its cramped foundational bounds in a social compromise between the
rational ego and the animal drives in man and a number of approaches which make
a larger description and ideal realization of human consciousness, humanistic,
developmental, existential and transpersonal, have appeared in the western
academy to represent possibilities more in keeping with a future-directed
definition of the human being, taking into account the highest possibilities
which have been experienced and expressed so far. This trend is clearly
anticipated in Sri Aurobindo’s yogic works, which once again, should be read
cross-culturally, as part of a disciplinary transformation of the western study
of applied psychology as well as an original contribution to the Indian
discipline of yoga.
In this short discussion of Sri Aurobindo’s philosophy and
psychology, we see a principal characteristic of his contribution towards the
future of humanity – it includes all the threads of human thinking that have
gone before, overcomes their one-sidedness and puts each in its place in a
complex structure which yet seems simple and inevitable in its integral
perfection. One of the signs of integrality is its ultimate simplicity. Indeed,
one of the founding intuitions of modern science – and that which makes it seek
for the Law which explains all laws – is that reality is ultimately simple. The
perfection that nature presents to us is of this order – even in unfathomable
intricacy and complexity there exists a miraculous harmony which faces us with
the simple being of the creation, its indivisible unity. This is something
man-made creations can never achieve – they inevitably turn out to be assemblages
of constituents. In Sri Aurobindo’s writings we find this overwhelming sense of
the unity and perfection of being, even in their great complexity they bear the
mark of something which is a creation of nature, albeit a higher nature fully
self-conscious in all its parts, of its wholeness.
If Philosophy and Psychology can be thought of as the
principal moulds in which Sri Aurobindo has presented his formulation of human
identity and its scope and possibilities of self-transcendence, his vision of
the future extends from this basis to the social forms and expressions required
to give collective body to this process of self-exceeding. This vein of Sri
Aurobindo’s thinking certainly needs further study, since in his works on
social and political theory – viz. The Human Cycle and The Ideal of Human Unity
- he proceeds to explore both the micro dimension of city states and autonomous
communities and the macro dimensions of political governance, whether of
nations or of continental and world unities of the future. Sri Aurobindo makes
the distinction between constructed and administered unities such as empires and nation-states and the
psychological unity of a people with a shared history and culture, which may
develop an autonomous collective soul-personality, such as what he calls
nation-soul. These organic unities are evolving trajectories of the world-soul
in its movement towards a transcendental integrality. Today, such an idea as
that of the “nation-soul†is likely to be viewed with suspicion due to the deep
traumas of chauvinistic nationalism, racial or cultural imperialism, ethnic
cleansing and the like which have continued to mark the modern era ever since
the alarming advent of Nazi Germany. Sri Aurobindo anticipates such abuse of
the idea in a masterful chapter titled “True and False Subjectivismâ€[6] in
The Human Cycle, pointing to the essential identity of all souls, whether
individual or collective, the need to make a distinction between the group soul
and the group ego and the principle of unity in diversity which he sees as the
basis of the world evolution. Thus fraternal relationship, creative cultural
dialog and syntheses and voluntary confederation are the desirable processes he
sees between all levels of such unities leading to an organized world unity. In
today’s world, many of the ideas introduced in Sri Aurobindo’s early 20th
c. social texts are in the making, highlighting the futurism of his vision. The
economic interdependence of the world has spawned the vector of continental
unity, the first example of which we see in the EEC. In his Ideal of Human
Unity, Sri Aurobindo has a chapter titled ‘The United States of Europe’ which
is prescient of just such a development.[7]
Moreover, the need for global intervention in peacekeeping, facilitated
settlement of inter-national disputes and the protection of basic human, cultural
and ecological properties and rights is stronger than ever, pointing to the
imperative need for a stronger impartial world organ with true international
representation, such as the United Nations. Additionally, individual lives,
metropolitan cities and intentional communities worldwide have been impacted by
globalization and telecommunication to an extent where national belongings and
boundaries have been rendered porous, and trans-national interactions and
identities are in the making. Here, too, the danger of commercial co-optation
and human conditioning in the name of globalization are pressing dangers
against which Sri Aurobindo warns; and experiments in evolving collective
consciousness, based on a strengthening and development of the inner life and
its expressions, focus on sustainability, production primarily for satisfying
community needs and a selective interface with the world market, open to
innovations and idea currents facilitating inner needs, as with the ashram
founded by Sri Aurobindo or the planetary city, Auroville, founded by Sri
Aurobindo’s collaborator, the Mother are indicators of future possibilities for
fostering the social conditions preparing the life divine.
Another area of human activity and expression where Sri Aurobindo
has left his tracks towards the future is that of Poetry. In an age of
technological dominance, when poetry is mostly thought of as an irrelevant and
eccentric pastime or a “useless†luxury of the idle rich or at best an
interesting curiosity practiced by the swiftly disappearing tribe of
counter-cultural bohemians, Sri Aurobindo’s choice of poetry as a human
activity to lavish his serious attention on may raise some eyebrows or worse,
be indulgently ignored. But to do so is to ignore also the revaluation of culture
implied in this choice. In Sri Aurobindo’s vision, no multiplication of external
technological means, however powerful, and whether seen as the paradigm behind
material products and devices or behind various forms of optimistic (or
dangerous) human tinkering – genetic, economic, social, political or
environmental engineering – can take the place of the growth and transformation
of human consciousness as the fundamental lever of individual and social change
towards the manifestation of an ideal future. If the applied psychology of yoga
is the primary means for such change, the most basic self-representation of
this evolving consciousness, whether as personal awareness or as social
currency, is language. In the words of the modern German philosopher, Martin
Heidegger (who follows in the wake of Nietzsche in redefining human identity
and the role and mode of thinking), “Language is the house of Being.â€[8] By
this he means that the language of a people affords access to the ground of
their existence in a certain form. Even seen only as a social convention,
language discloses and conceals Being. Infinite being appears only to the
measure and in the shape given to it by language. But beyond social convention,
language has mysterious powers, words and constructions may have connotational
density, allusive turns, primordial sound values and rhythms relating them to universal
movements of consciousness, suggestive metaphorical and archetypal imagery and
revelatory intuitive messages. In ancient cultures, the magicians of language,
the vates of
From all of the above, we see how Sri Aurobindo’s
contribution to the future of humanity is all-encompassing, profound and
horizon-extending. Sri Aurobindo redefines the human being as a future-oriented
transitional being; he sets the goal of humanity as the highest achievement it
is presently capable of setting for its future, the evolution into a new
species of divine beings collectively manifesting a divine life on earth; he
revises the scope of human disciplines of knowledge-seeking and expression to
reflect such a future-orientation and aid in its realization; and he presents a
wide and flexible blueprint for the achievement of such a future. Finally, Sri
Aurobindo is himself the example in
being, life and works of one who has “hew(n) the ways of Immortalityâ€[9]
for such a future for humanity, and the continuing influence, help and power in
the journey of humanity towards this superhuman future.
[1] Sri
Aurobindo, Sri Aurobindo On Himself, Sri
Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry, 1972, p.4.
[2] The
Mother, Message on Sri Aurobindo, 14th February, 1961, Collected Works of the Mother, Vol. 13, Sri
Aurobindo Ashram Pondicherry, 1985, p.4.
[3] Sri
Aurobindo, Savitri, Book III, Canto
Four, Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry, 1972, p. 343.
[4] “Man is a transitional being; he is not
final. For in man and high beyond him ascend the radiant degrees that rise to a
divine supermanhood. There lies our destiny and the liberating key to our
aspiring but troubled and limited mundane existence. “ Sri Aurobindo,
“Man a Transitional Beingâ€, The Hour of
God, Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry, 1972, p. 7
[5] A contemporary
version of this Hegelian idea may be seen in the work of Francis Fukuyama. See
Fukuyama, The En d of History and the
Last Man, Penguin Books, London, 1992.
[6] Sri Aurobindo, The Human Cycle, Chapter V, “True
and False Subjectivism†in The Human
Cycle, The Ideal of Human Unity and War and Self-Determination, Sri Aurobindo
Ashram, Pondicherry, 1970, pp. 37-47.
[7] Sri Aurobindo, The Ideal of Human Unity, Chapter
X, “The United States of Europe†in The
Human Cycle, The Ideal of Human Unity and War and Self-Determination, Sri
Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry, 1970, pp. 324-333.
[8] Martin
Heidegger, “Letter on Humanism†(1946) in Pathmarks,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, p. 239.
[9] Sri
Aurobindo, Savitri, Book I, Canto
Two, Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry, 1972, p. 17.
Attachment: