SCIY.Org Archives

This is an archived material originally posted on sciy.org which is no longer active. The title, content, author, date of posting shown below, all are as per the sciy.org records
nietzsche at the mall

Originally posted on sciy.org by Rich Carlson on Fri 02 Dec 2005 07:49 PM PST  

Click the following link for this entire humorous article on difference, the will to consumption, as Nietzsche visits the mall:

here is the link:
https://www.tomorrowtoday.biz/generations/xpaper2007.htm

More is going on here however then just tongue and cheek. It's a nice look at co-dependent origination..

The self-other opposition is a difference which itself must be accounted for: the binary opposition, "self-other" is, in Derridean terms, a structure which provides for the stability of its constituent opposites but cannot account for its own "structurality," its own "center." If Derrida is right this structurality is not a static, metaphysical reality but a relationship created by the play of differance. So the elementary deconstruction of the idea of self - that it is in necessary opposition to the other and that both opposites fit within a structure whose structurality is generated by a process of playful differentiation - provides a neostructuralist view of "self" as a form of inscription in a dynamic language game which can only come to rest through the failure to think, or the agreement to stop thinking, that is metaphysics (See Kamuf, 64 ff.).

This is the insight that prompted Heidegger to write The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking. But what of Nietzsche's other alternative? What view of self is implicit in the critique evident in the second quotation from The Will to Power? Is it not the deconstructed, heterogeneous "schizophrenic" persona of postmodernity? Is deconstruction, then, a form of empowerment? Does it animate the self it recontextualizes as inscribed within the play of differance, or does it simply make it into a passive design in an unfolding pattern?

As Foucault argues, "In fact, among all the mutations that have affected the knowledge of things and their order, the knowledge of identities, differences, characters, equivalencies, words - in short, in the midst of all the episodes of that profound history of the Same - only one, that which began a century and a half ago and is now perhaps drawing to a close, has made it possible for the figure of man to appear." (The Order of Things 386)

Attachment: